To Musk: Sorry! Artificial intelligence does not threaten more than North Korea
[Netease smart news August 14 news] Recently, Elon Musk came out to promote AI threat theory, this time he claimed that the threat of AI to human beings is greater than the threat posed by North Korea's nuclear test. However, is the fact really true?
Some may say that "regulation," "sanctions," and "rules" are not always pure "evil." Policies that guarantee road safety for commuting, or the U.S. government's sanctions on dealing with foreign relations, are necessary, not evil. However, when it comes to artificial intelligence, do we really need to worry about it?
Automotive, Aircraft and Artificial Intelligence
Musk has repeatedly stated his fear of AI, from calling for strict supervision of the government on artificial intelligence, and later to the intense debate on AI between Facebook and Zuckerberg, he has repeatedly reiterated that AI will lose control and become human in the future. Dominated. In recent days, he said on Twitter that the dangers of artificial intelligence and machine learning are "much larger" than North Korea. Then he sent another tweet and said, "All things that pose a threat to the public" are supervised, including cars and planes.
Given the comparison between artificial intelligence and automotive aircraft, we can't help but think of a problem: Compared to a plane that weighs two or three tons and may fall from the sky and cause a huge disaster, the current artificial intelligence is only an intangible algorithm and Tools, and recent experts say that most of the artificial intelligence we have seen so far are not real artificial intelligence. It can be seen that people have too high judgments on AI.
In the era of artificial intelligence, what is the current stage?
Babyhood! Not even to the time of toddlers, but people are now beginning to worry that the "infant" AI will go crazy and kill in the future. In response, there are still many netizens opposing Musk's statement. One user stated that it is "inappropriate" to compare nuclear threats with artificial intelligence. Some people say that the real danger is that humans create "useless" artificial intelligence. Another person pointed out that if a nuclear war took place, whether or not the machine ruled the world may not be entirely important, because we will all die.
AI threat theory? Discussion details are king!
The problem with the “end of the world” theory brought about by artificial intelligence is that it never explores specific details. This is a randomly picked Twitter, which compares AI to nuclear war. This is another randomly selected tweet to discuss regulation. But what kind of artificial intelligence should humans supervise? Who supervises? In what areas do you monitor? What is the real danger? What are the precautions?
The current problem with human panic in AI is that there is currently no machine that can truly cause a massive destructive accident. Some people may say that autopilot caused a case of death, chatbot crashes, football robot revenge coaches and so on. However, are these "accidents" a car accident that occurs every 30 seconds in the world, compared with the case of abnormal murders caused by mental ill health? Can we abandon or even prohibit the use of mobile phones because we see individual cases where long-term phone watching can lead to blindness?
Musk had previously pointed out that before the AI loses control, humans and even the government should supervise it. However, he still didn't say exactly what should be supervised - Google's DeepMind? Microsoft's Word? Chat bot? Can I turn off the home sensor subroutine of your sprinkler system? Or satellite? Autopilot truck?
At present, people's understanding of artificial intelligence is more about hearing, seeing, talking, but do we really understand artificial intelligence? People are still unable to define the real artificial intelligence, but also talk about its regulatory control?
Let us discuss this issue openly and understand the details of supervision. Experts believe that companies that make chat bots do not need to be supervised. They need someone to urge them to use existing funds to create and innovate better and more useful robots. Or do we need to make robot-related laws? If this is the case, we need to face a whole new question - what exactly is the definition of a robot?
The problem is clear: When you start talking about specific regulations and dangers, the topic becomes a bit ridiculous. Are we actually asking the country and the government to do something? And when you start talking about robots dominating the earth because they want to destroy humans... it may be a bit too late now. You are like a toast, and the robot has already won. What we need to discuss is details, not generalizations.
Do you agree with Musk's point of view? (Source: VentureBeat 犠髡撸涸 げ げ 嫉牨嘁耄 嫉牨嘁耄 嫉牨嘁耄 嫉牨嘁耄 嫉牨嘁耄 庵 庵 庵 庵 庵 庵 庵 庵 )
Pay attention to NetEase smart public number (smartman163), get the latest report of artificial intelligence industry.
LED Lighting Zinc Alloy Die Casting
Led Lighting Zinc Alloy Die Casting,Aluminum Alloys Die Casting,Aluminum Zinc Alloy Die Casting,Motor Housing Parts Casting
Dongguan Metalwork Technology Co., LTD. , https://www.diecast-pro.com
برچسب: ،